Wednesday, June 26, 2013

Any Which Way You Can

Related image

Today's essay is a reprise of a theme I've articulated here (and in about a thousand comments on Jihad Watch over the years) Every Which Way But Loose -- the "problem of the problem":  Why the West persists in its tardigrade myopia about the primary problem, the problem of Mohammedans and their Mohammedanism.

I wish it didn't bear repeating, because it's getting exhausting to have to keep reiterating, exhaustively, what should be grasped by now.

Although the title implies a more precise focus, the essay is really about the broader complex of Politically Correct Multi-Culturalism and how that affects the primary problem:

Lawrence Auster's First Law of Majority-Minority Relations

§ § §

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

"Furthermore, this post-modern Westerner has been indoctrinated in the revisionist history whereby he has learned that only the white West has been guilty of crimes of racism and ethnic cleansing, if not wholesale genocide, of ethnic peoples throughout history, and that ethnic peoples, by contrast, are as innocent as gazelles on the savannah by nature the prey of the evil White Lions who went colonizing and raping the Third World."

Hi Hesperado,

These are really genetic wars for dominance.

The post-modern Westerner is the descendant of the white European Christian Westerner.

Focus here on this statement: "...this post-modern Westerner has been indoctrinated...."

By whom? Indoctrinated by whom?

As any old-timey English teacher would tell you: Your writing is much stronger if you use active voice instead of passive voice.

Of course, using active voice here would lead you to active thinking AND, ironically, to the SAME exact uncomfortable psychological place as the post-modern Westerner who literally CANNOT criticize Muslims because the act of criticism would erroneously and spuriously define the post-modern Westerner to be a 'bad person' - in both PC MC law and Sharia Law.

If it were ONE person who had done the indoctrinating, then we might name and criticize that ONE person (like we criticize Hitler). But, would the same be true if it were a group doing the indoctrinating?

So, which group indoctrinated the post-modern Westerner into utter ruin - and to what genetic purpose?

Think about it, just your use of the word 'indoctrinated' shows intent or a concerted effort or a plan to CHANGE the mind and actions of the post-modern Westerner - in this case to be genetically self-destructive.

P.S. That group was NOT Muslims - the Johnny-come-latelys who some group has imported to the West to dilute and/or eliminate the gene pool of the white European Christian Westerner via mass immigration and civil war.

Egghead

Hesperado said...

"Focus here on this statement: "...this post-modern Westerner has been indoctrinated...."

By whom? Indoctrinated by whom?"

Related to the paradox at the heart of PC MC -- the morosoph, the learned fool, Quantum Ignorance, and so forth -- is the paradox of an indoctrination that wells up like sweat from the tissues of society: a self-imposed indoctrination.

Further amplifying this latter paradox is another paradox -- which could be variously formulated as Regressive Progress; Destructive Constructive Thinking; Hell-bound Paved Roads with Good Intentions; Irrationally Over-Developed Classic Virtues; and so on.

The alternative, without actual proof (and not a complex tissue of inferences, dots and darkly cynical foreboding), is simply impermissible.

Anonymous said...

Because it is currently deemed 'impermissible' to name the true enemy and its Muslim frontmen, white Christians will eventually fight in a bloodbath of Biblical proportions.

The Art of War:

"So it is said that if you know your enemies and know yourself, you can win a hundred battles without a single loss.
"If you only know yourself, but not your opponent, you may win or may lose.
"If you know neither yourself nor your enemy, you will always endanger yourself."

"All warfare is based on deception. Hence, when we are able to attack, we must seem unable; when using our forces, we must appear inactive; when we are near, we must make the enemy believe we are far away; when far away, we must make him believe we are near."

Egghead

Hesperado said...

Of course, I mean rationally impermissible.

Anonymous said...

Whites have been indoctrinated into loathing their culture, religion, their very heritage and to literally feel ashamed of being White and many are convinced that their ethnicity and culture is the primary cause of misery in the world. (see Dailykos for the latter)

This is a quite new phenomenon in the U.S. and can only be traced back to perhaps the 1930's and didn't flower until the 1960's.

In Europe these people took over after WWII and proceeded to gut those nations like a fish via social engineering programs that destroyed their birth rate, family structure, ended the role of the father, culture and nationalism. Basically everything that makes us who we are.

You can even see it in the eradication of traditional Western architecture and being replaced with boxes with all the charm of a trash can. The visual arts and music are in a similar dire situation. The Guggenheim in Spain is a example of this writ large.

We've become a people with no past and no future with no culture to call our own.


As to which ideological movement is behind it, is well.... obvious.