tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29566846.post4520070794318148982..comments2023-11-05T01:45:58.784-07:00Comments on The Hesperado: The corner Robert Spencer paints himself intoHesperadohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10394374828751466705noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29566846.post-61670723029993751382010-06-15T13:01:38.351-07:002010-06-15T13:01:38.351-07:00Sagunto, thanks for your comment.
You wrote:
&qu...Sagunto, thanks for your comment.<br /><br />You wrote:<br /><br />"The decisive factor for us "infidels" should be the proportion of muslims that want to implement sharia law in the West."<br /><br />If I thought it were possible to galvanize the West into a program that forces this issue upon Muslims in the West -- and cocomitant with that restricts or forbids immigration of new Muslims -- now or in the next five years or so, I might be persuaded that this is a viable way to manage the problem of Islam. But I see no signs that the West is ready now, or in the foreseeable future, to force this issue in the massive way necessary. In fact, other than a lone Wilders in the wilderness, there are signs throughout the West of a continued, if not an increasing, PC MC defense of Muslims and Islam.<br /><br />Thus, given the high probability that the Wilders solution will not be adopted any time soon, and that the West will only get around to being able to do it in about 50 years from now, the Wilders solution changes form. The West will not be the same in about 50 years with regard to its Muslims, with regard to Muslim demographics in the West, and with regard to the increasing belligerence of Muslims worldwide and within the West. By the time the West is ready to implement a Wilders policy, the nature of the beast will have changed under our noses. The Wilders policy will at that future date be too little, too late.<br /><br />(I'll try to respond to other points you raised later)Hesperadohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10394374828751466705noreply@blogger.com