tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29566846.post915692822941058425..comments2023-11-05T01:45:58.784-07:00Comments on The Hesperado: Particle Physics in the Counter-JihadHesperadohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10394374828751466705noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29566846.post-22652137368749788222014-06-25T22:15:36.682-07:002014-06-25T22:15:36.682-07:00Thanks, Hesperado. I agree with your last comment...Thanks, Hesperado. I agree with your last comment.<br /><br />Please note that Obama's top Muslim advisers continue to tell the press that the USA is an Islamic country.<br /><br />These Muslims are attempting to set the precedent that American Muslims believe the the USA is already in the ummah.<br /><br />As Mohammed indicated to Aisha, silence is consent.Eggheadnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29566846.post-87459898597870227342014-06-25T11:54:55.411-07:002014-06-25T11:54:55.411-07:00Thanks for all those links, Egghead. I agree that...Thanks for all those links, Egghead. I agree that Islam is a conspiracy to overthrow not only America, but all governments in order to establish Islam as supreme on Earth. As such, any Muslim is ipso facto a traitor/seditionist. The next step would be to recognize that, given Islam, a Muslim cannot be a citizen, but can only feign citizenship, and that all the Muslim citizens any Western polity has must be -- not redefined, but correctly defined as what they already are, citizens (in effect) of another entity whose citizenship requirements necessitate an essential incompatibility and contradiction with citizenship in any non-Islamic entity.Hesperadohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10394374828751466705noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29566846.post-338390128673295312014-06-24T15:02:30.062-07:002014-06-24T15:02:30.062-07:00"In law, sedition is overt conduct, such as s..."In law, sedition is overt conduct, such as speech and organization, that is deemed by the legal authority to tend toward insurrection against the established order. Sedition often includes subversion of a constitution and incitement of discontent (or resistance) to lawful authority. Sedition may include any commotion, though not aimed at direct and open violence against the laws. Seditious words in writing are seditious libel. A seditionist is one who engages in or promotes the interests of sedition.<br /><br />"Typically, sedition is considered a subversive act, and the overt acts that may be prosecutable under sedition laws vary from one legal code to another. Where the history of these legal codes has been traced, there is also a record of the change in the definition of the elements constituting sedition at certain points in history. This overview has served to develop a sociological definition of sedition as well, within the study of state persecution."<br /><br />"The term sedition in its modern meaning first appeared in the Elizabethan Era (c. 1590) as the 'notion of inciting by words or writings disaffection towards the state or constituted authority'.[citation needed] 'Sedition complements treason and martial law: while treason controls primarily the privileged, ecclesiastical opponents, priests, and Jesuits, as well as certain commoners; and martial law frightens commoners, sedition frightens intellectuals.'"<br /><br />http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SeditionEggheadnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29566846.post-62258383392364301222014-06-24T14:51:13.469-07:002014-06-24T14:51:13.469-07:00"In criminal law, a conspiracy is an agreemen..."In criminal law, a conspiracy is an agreement between two or more persons to commit a crime at some time in the future. Criminal law in some countries or for some conspiracies may require that at least one overt act must also have been undertaken in furtherance of that agreement, to constitute an offense. There is no limit on the number participating in the conspiracy and, in most countries, no requirement that any steps have been taken to put the plan into effect (compare attempts which require proximity to the full offence). For the purposes of concurrence, the actus reus is a continuing one and parties may join the plot later and incur joint liability and conspiracy can be charged where the co-conspirators have been acquitted or cannot be traced. Finally, repentance by one or more parties does not affect liability but may reduce their sentence."<br /><br />http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conspiracy_%28criminal%29Eggheadnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29566846.post-24095488473278797652014-06-23T20:40:13.180-07:002014-06-23T20:40:13.180-07:00Well, being criminal doesn't necessarily mean ...Well, being criminal doesn't necessarily mean you are dangerous in the systemic sense Islam stands for. Anyway, it's kind of semantic, since my main point is that because we don't know which Muslims are dangerous (even given the possibility that some are not), it doesn't matter: they are all equally dangerous in pragmatic terms.Hesperadohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10394374828751466705noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29566846.post-47469910845522410312014-06-23T19:04:48.160-07:002014-06-23T19:04:48.160-07:00"My holistic position is not an ontological p..."My holistic position is not an ontological position; it is a pragmatic position. I.e., I am not saying 'All Muslims are in fact dangerous'."<br /><br />For me, it IS an ontological position. Islam is a criminal enterprise where each Muslim is either an active criminal or the beneficiary of another Muslim's criminality - at the direct dire expense of non-Muslims.<br /><br />Muslims MUST repudiate the evil of Islam. Muslims should never self-identify as Muslims - but should ONLY as self-identify as former Muslims - and be ready and willing to give the many reasons for that repudiation - including a 100% repudiation of Mohammed and all evil that he represents.<br /><br />Christian Europe understood that it is Christians versus Muslims and strictly forbade Islam and Muslims in Europe until the very recent past.<br /><br />Muslim countries did - and do - understand the existential threat that Christianity and Christians pose to Islam and Muslims - and thus still forbid and persecute Christianity and Christians where possible in Muslim countries. Eggheadnoreply@blogger.com