tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29566846.post8785260345233433085..comments2023-11-05T01:45:58.784-07:00Comments on The Hesperado: White Muslims: Honorary Browns (Part 1)Hesperadohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10394374828751466705noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29566846.post-66545817425309218852008-05-25T23:33:00.000-07:002008-05-25T23:33:00.000-07:00II.2) Because of II.1, then: when you criticize a ...<I>II.2) Because of II.1, then: when you criticize a non-white aggregate (like Islam and/or Muslims), you are being “racist”, even when that is not your intent.<BR/></I><BR/>I don't dispute this, but I think the reason one is accused of being 'racist' here is one's race. If one is a White Infidel criticizing a non-White Muslim, the charge is made not only because the target is a non-White, but more because the critic is White. And as I pointed out in our previous discussion on the Serb aspect of this, because the Serbs are considered 'White', the Bosnians/Albanians get sympathized with, despite being <I>White</I> Muslims. Ditto for Chechens & Russians.<BR/><BR/>Actually, a good litmus test of your theory would be a conflict between non-White Infidels & White Muslims. However, I can't think of any such examples, unlike in the case of the Serbs that I dug up above. UK maybe - like Yvonne Ridley vs Michael Nazir Ali?Nobodyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15936731686633423188noreply@blogger.com