Thanks Fiqh! And if Egghead comes along, I was thinking of her when I added just recently a comment in another thread below:
"Thanks Egghead. What a coincidence. I closed off my blog for a few hours from readers (I thought about you and how you would reasonably suppose this was related to your concerns about computer tampering; but I can assure you it's not.)"
Well this is a coincidence. Just after I posted on your blog just now, I noticed that you referenced me under my old moniker 'out of context' in the Hannity thread on JW. Thank you for that.
Yes, first I was 'out of context,' then I was 'Fiqh Al-Matter.' Then I got banned.
I need to rejoin, but I suppose that means that I need to start a different email address.
Wow Fiqh, I didn't know you were "out of context"! And so you are now currently banned? If so, I hope you consider rejoining JW comments soon. Lord knows I've done so -- many times over the years.
Keeping in mind WHO runs the Fed (and it is most definitely NOT Muslims or Christians), read this important piece, too: http://www.barnhardt.biz/2015/01/09/how-could-trillions-of-dollars-be-laundered-from-the-wash-dc-regime-to-saudi-arabia-why-through-citigroup-of-course/
As LC says, fractal banking is about creating a feudal system. LC seems to believe that European aristocracy is 'using' Jews to institute feudalism. I say that European aristocracy IS Jewish due to intermarriage intended to achieve that purpose. After all, Jews relish being descended from King David and being royal (and what defines 'being royal' more than the idea of being 'chosen' by God to lead to world?).
The overarching goal seems to be that one 'superior' race (and what better measure of 'superior' than high IQ?!) will rule the entire world forever.
The main problem is that the anti-jihadists REFUSE to think about the BIG picture which is being planned and activated by people other than low IQ Muslims - and that BIG picture is the return to feudalism. Now, if you define feudalism as being 'the West,' well then, it should be fine and dandy to have a feudal society - if you are a feudal lord - but, for everyone else, it is brutal.
As to the oft-cited mythical Judeo-Christian culture:
"But let us consider: did Ruth convert? Well, first of all, it's pretty logical to assume that she did, since the Torah explicitly forbids us to marry Gentiles who have not converted. In Deuteronomy 7:3 the Torah tells us, "Do not marry with them; your daughter you may not give to a Gentile's son, and you may not take a Gentile's daughter for your son." Why? Because, says the Torah, "For he will take your son away from Me, and they will worship the gods of others..." (ibid., verse 4). (See my article, "Judaism: Race, Religion, or Ethnicity?" for further explanation of this Commandment.)"
"Note, by the way, that the Torah's prohibition against marrying a Gentile applies to both a Jewish man marrying a Gentile woman, and a Jewish woman marrying a Gentile man. Both are forbidden."
"We see here that the prophets considered what King Solomon did, in marrying Gentile women, to be a sin. Had they fully and properly converted, they would not have influenced him away from Hashem. (Bear in mind that the Talmud says that King Solomon never actually worshipped any idols, but since he did not stop his wives from doing so when he could have, Hashem considered it as if it were King Solomon's own sin.)"
"Even back then, evidently, there was a process of conversion. Thus we have amply proven that Ruth was a convert, just like Sarah, Rebecca, Leah, Rachel, Bilha, and Zilpah. And as I said above, in any case the nationality of Ruth would not have thrown into question the Jewishness of King David, who was her great-grandson."
"I wish to reiterate that absolutely none of what I wrote here is my own opinion. Everything in this article I took from the Talmud and otheR Rabbinic Writings from over a thousand years ago. None of this is my own interpretation, and none of this did I think up on my own, unless I explicitly said so."
Yes, there IS a bona fide reason that Chelsea Clinton and Ivanka Trump married Jewish men. Who loves power and money more - and knows better where the future is headed than the Clintons and the Trumps?
“The powers of financial capitalism had (a) far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent meetings and conferences. The apex of the systems was to be the Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the world’s central banks which were themselves private corporations. Each central bank…sought to dominate its government by its ability to control Treasury loans, to manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence the level of economic activity in the country, and to influence cooperative politicians by subsequent economic rewards in the business world.”
Carroll Quigley, member of Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), mentor to Bill Clinton, quote from “Tragedy and Hope”, 1966
Yes, that would be the same Carroll Quigley who believed in international conspiracies - most especially those that STOPPED his own work from being published.
"One distinctive feature of Quigley's historical writings was his assertion that secret societies have played a significant role in recent world history. His writing on this topic has made Quigley famous among many who investigate conspiracy theories.[2]:96, 98 Quigley's views are particularly notable because the majority of reputable academic historians profess skepticism about conspiracy theories.[18]"
So, what about my 'eliminated' comment upset my minders so much?
Well, I wrote that Christians are the ONLY group that can win this war because Christians will be fighting FOR something good instead of against something evil.
You will NOT get Christians to fight so that Jews, atheists, Mormons, sodomites, and others can rule the West in the worst interest of Christians. You will ONLY get Christians to fight so that Christians can rule the West.
As in Europe past, there is NO big tent here, there is ONLY a Christian tent. And that is where the counter-jihad breaks down now, in that (particularly) Jews and other non-Christian groups including patently non-believing 'lukewarm' cultural Christians are running the show - and that is NOT going to motivate Christians to join the anti-jihad movement. Christians MUST assume leadership of the counter-jihad (and the current 'Pope' is more Marxist than Christian so we need someone other than him - and his ilk).
Whew!
ReplyDeleteStill here with ya Hesp. Been out of things for a while because of some personal issues, but count me among the 17.5.
Thanks Fiqh! And if Egghead comes along, I was thinking of her when I added just recently a comment in another thread below:
ReplyDelete"Thanks Egghead. What a coincidence. I closed off my blog for a few hours from readers (I thought about you and how you would reasonably suppose this was related to your concerns about computer tampering; but I can assure you it's not.)"
Well this is a coincidence. Just after I posted on your blog just now, I noticed that you referenced me under my old moniker 'out of context' in the Hannity thread on JW. Thank you for that.
ReplyDeleteYes, first I was 'out of context,' then I was 'Fiqh Al-Matter.' Then I got banned.
I need to rejoin, but I suppose that means that I need to start a different email address.
Hi Hesp,
ReplyDeleteThanks for thinking of me. :)
Read this: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2903930/PIERS-MORGAN-accept-Paris-murderers-aren-t-real-Muslims-won-t-MUSLIM-world-say-too.html
Wow Fiqh, I didn't know you were "out of context"! And so you are now currently banned? If so, I hope you consider rejoining JW comments soon. Lord knows I've done so -- many times over the years.
ReplyDeleteThanks Egghead; what a depressing piece. Piers Morgan is so thoroughly besotted with PC MC it's almost surprising.
ReplyDeleteHi Hesp,
ReplyDeleteKeeping in mind WHO runs the Fed (and it is most definitely NOT Muslims or Christians), read this important piece, too: http://www.barnhardt.biz/2015/01/09/how-could-trillions-of-dollars-be-laundered-from-the-wash-dc-regime-to-saudi-arabia-why-through-citigroup-of-course/
As LC says, fractal banking is about creating a feudal system. LC seems to believe that European aristocracy is 'using' Jews to institute feudalism. I say that European aristocracy IS Jewish due to intermarriage intended to achieve that purpose. After all, Jews relish being descended from King David and being royal (and what defines 'being royal' more than the idea of being 'chosen' by God to lead to world?).
The overarching goal seems to be that one 'superior' race (and what better measure of 'superior' than high IQ?!) will rule the entire world forever.
The main problem is that the anti-jihadists REFUSE to think about the BIG picture which is being planned and activated by people other than low IQ Muslims - and that BIG picture is the return to feudalism. Now, if you define feudalism as being 'the West,' well then, it should be fine and dandy to have a feudal society - if you are a feudal lord - but, for everyone else, it is brutal.
As to the oft-cited mythical Judeo-Christian culture:
ReplyDelete"But let us consider: did Ruth convert? Well, first of all, it's pretty logical to assume that she did, since the Torah explicitly forbids us to marry Gentiles who have not converted. In Deuteronomy 7:3 the Torah tells us, "Do not marry with them; your daughter you may not give to a Gentile's son, and you may not take a Gentile's daughter for your son." Why? Because, says the Torah, "For he will take your son away from Me, and they will worship the gods of others..." (ibid., verse 4). (See my article, "Judaism: Race, Religion, or Ethnicity?" for further explanation of this Commandment.)"
"Note, by the way, that the Torah's prohibition against marrying a Gentile applies to both a Jewish man marrying a Gentile woman, and a Jewish woman marrying a Gentile man. Both are forbidden."
"We see here that the prophets considered what King Solomon did, in marrying Gentile women, to be a sin. Had they fully and properly converted, they would not have influenced him away from Hashem. (Bear in mind that the Talmud says that King Solomon never actually worshipped any idols, but since he did not stop his wives from doing so when he could have, Hashem considered it as if it were King Solomon's own sin.)"
"Even back then, evidently, there was a process of conversion. Thus we have amply proven that Ruth was a convert, just like Sarah, Rebecca, Leah, Rachel, Bilha, and Zilpah. And as I said above, in any case the nationality of Ruth would not have thrown into question the Jewishness of King David, who was her great-grandson."
"I wish to reiterate that absolutely none of what I wrote here is my own opinion. Everything in this article I took from the Talmud and otheR Rabbinic Writings from over a thousand years ago. None of this is my own interpretation, and none of this did I think up on my own, unless I explicitly said so."
http://www.beingjewish.com/identity/kingdavidjew.html
Yes, there IS a bona fide reason that Chelsea Clinton and Ivanka Trump married Jewish men. Who loves power and money more - and knows better where the future is headed than the Clintons and the Trumps?
ReplyDelete“The powers of financial capitalism had (a) far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent meetings and conferences. The apex of the systems was to be the Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the world’s central banks which were themselves private corporations. Each central bank…sought to dominate its government by its ability to control Treasury loans, to manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence the level of economic activity in the country, and to influence cooperative politicians by subsequent economic rewards in the business world.”
Carroll Quigley, member of Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), mentor to Bill Clinton, quote from “Tragedy and Hope”, 1966
Yes, that would be the same Carroll Quigley who believed in international conspiracies - most especially those that STOPPED his own work from being published.
"One distinctive feature of Quigley's historical writings was his assertion that secret societies have played a significant role in recent world history. His writing on this topic has made Quigley famous among many who investigate conspiracy theories.[2]:96, 98 Quigley's views are particularly notable because the majority of reputable academic historians profess skepticism about conspiracy theories.[18]"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carroll_Quigley
So, what about my 'eliminated' comment upset my minders so much?
ReplyDeleteWell, I wrote that Christians are the ONLY group that can win this war because Christians will be fighting FOR something good instead of against something evil.
You will NOT get Christians to fight so that Jews, atheists, Mormons, sodomites, and others can rule the West in the worst interest of Christians. You will ONLY get Christians to fight so that Christians can rule the West.
As in Europe past, there is NO big tent here, there is ONLY a Christian tent. And that is where the counter-jihad breaks down now, in that (particularly) Jews and other non-Christian groups including patently non-believing 'lukewarm' cultural Christians are running the show - and that is NOT going to motivate Christians to join the anti-jihad movement. Christians MUST assume leadership of the counter-jihad (and the current 'Pope' is more Marxist than Christian so we need someone other than him - and his ilk).
http://www.openbible.info/topics/lukewarm_christians