On the new and improved Jihad Watch (hopefully bug- and Islamoleftist-free from now on), Robert Spencer announces a debate he scheduled with some Muslim. Frankly, it's a shame that we still need to debate Muslims; but, alas, we do, and we have the comfortably complacent and thoroughly scurrilous boneheadedness of millions of our fellow Westerners to blame for that.
For, we have come to know with weary amusement that there will be no
surprises from this debate, nothing from Mubin Shaikh, Spencer's opponent, that has not been
repeated 1,001 times before by Islamopologists (and of course, nothing
that is not specious and fallacious).
Years ago, when this millennium was still reeling to a start in the wake of the epochal wake-up call of 911 (to which it still has not awoken), these various debates and public proclamations of "peace" by Muslims ("Islam is against terrorism", etc., ad nauseam) more and more aroused a vague sense of déjà jihad.
Years ago, when this millennium was still reeling to a start in the wake of the epochal wake-up call of 911 (to which it still has not awoken), these various debates and public proclamations of "peace" by Muslims ("Islam is against terrorism", etc., ad nauseam) more and more aroused a vague sense of déjà jihad.
Since, however, strictly speaking the various forms of déjà vu
are attended by feelings of disoriented bafflement; and since we are
now, into this second decade, no longer disoriented or baffled, only
weary and jaded from the grim realization that all Muslims lie and mean
us harm, the repetitive syndrome they foment is better metaphored by the
endless loop of Groundhog Day -- while those whose job it is to
inform and protect us remain derelict as they simultaneously bury their
heads in the sand whilst playing Whack-a-Mole with the Tiny Minority of
Extremists that keep popping up all around the world.
No comments:
Post a Comment