Introduction
"Dr. Elhagaly is no longer
employed or caring for patients at Mayo Clinic Health System in Albert Lea. We
are working with his patients to transition their care to another
physician."
This is what the Public Relations
department of the Mayo Clinic located in Rochester in southeastern Minnesota
wrote in an email on May 16.
And why was Dr. Elhagaly "no
longer employed" at Mayo Clinic? The email went on to say:
"Female circumcision in
children, referred to as female genital mutilation in U.S. legal statutes, is a
felony-level child abuse crime. Mayo Clinic strongly opposes the procedure and
it has never been performed at any Mayo Clinic facility."
Though this Mayo Clinic memo in its
rather flat affect doesn't clarify the point, the problem was not (apparently) that they had
found out that Dr. Elhagaly was actually practicing female
circumcision/mutilation on his patients, or that he had been counseling others
to do so; it was the fact that he had been caught red-handed delivering a paper
in which he advocated the practice of female circumcision/mutilation as a
time-honored form of feminine hygiene in Islamic culture and had indeed noted
that it was deemed by some Muslim authorities (whom he uncritically cited) as
an "honor" for the girls involved.
The Mayo memo reflects an important
victory for those concerned about human rights and the law -- and particularly
about the practice of female circumcision/mutilation, a practice in flagrant
and hideous violation of both human rights and all Western laws.
The rather monotonal announcement by
the Mayo Clinic quoted above was sent to one individual, an ordinary citizen
who a couple of weeks before May 16 had taken it upon himself to do something
about Dr. Elhagaly, and to inform Mayo Clinic of their responsibility in this
regard. Along the way, he garnered the support and help of many friends
and supporters.
For most of us concerned about the
problem of Islam, it seems like a hopelessly complex and sometimes bewildering
variety of issues, too often spanning the globe in far-flung places where we
feel impotent to do anything about it.
Rarely, it happens in our
backyard. And even then, we may not know about it until it's too late; or
we may still feel ineffectual to do anything about it.
One day in early May, an ordinary
citizen who goes by the online name of "CGW" learned of a
particularly galling outrage against human rights happening right in his neck
of the woods. This outrage involved a
doctor -- a pediatrician no less -- working in a clinic in the Mayo Clinic system
of a small southeastern Minnesota town called Albert Lea in the heartland of the U.S.A. As we noted
above, this pediatrician had been documented to have advocated (by expounding
at glowingly uncritical length) female circumcision not clearly distinguishable
from the worse crime against humanity of FGM (female genital mutilation), both
of which are felony crimes for underage females throughout the U.S.A. (and even
for grown women in most states).
I have asked CGW if I could
interview him with a few questions about how he got this done. He
graciously consented.
The Interview
Hesperado: How did you first hear about Dr. Elhagaly and his advocacy
of FGM?
CGW: I first heard about Dr. Elhagaly's advocacy of FGM on May 3,
2012 during my daily perusal of the articles posted on Jihad Watch, where
I saw the article titled Leading Muslim jurist: Female genital mutilation an
"honor" in Islam. I followed the link in that article to
the original article at Translating Jihad and subsequently read that.
Hesperado: You mean this doctor had advocated female
circumcision/mutilation in Arabic?
CGW: Yes. It was a paper he presented to an organization of
which he is a senior member, the Association of Muslim Jurists of America
(AMJA). I guess if it hadn't been for the individual at Translating
Jihad, who regularly translates Arabic documents into English, we may have
never found out about this American Muslim doctor's position on this issue.
Hesperado: Yes, that website, Translating Jihad, does good
work. In fact, not long ago, in early April, they published a translation of another document relating to this
Dr. Elhagaly -- namely, a paper delivered again at his organization, the AMJA,
in which the Muslim members, all esteemed professional Muslims living and
working in the U.S.A., were warned against working in law enforcement and were
reminded that as Muslims they should "not be pleased with a legal system
that does not come from Allah".
CGW: Yes, I recall reading about that at Jihad Watch, though at
the time I hadn't learned of the doctor's position on FGM.
Hesperado: And so reading the May 3rd article was the first time your
learned that a doctor working in your region of the U.S. was advocating what is
tantamount to FGM?
CGW: Yes.
Hesperado: So your own local mainstream news media failed you in this
regard -- they had failed to report a very important, and disturbing fact about
a local doctor?
CGW: That's right.
Hesperado: What first moved you to do something about this issue?
Why this particular issue, and not any number of the 1,001 other issues and
problems caused by Islam? Did you just throw a dart at a board of Islamic
Outrages and pick the first thing your dart hit, so to speak?
CGW: I have long been a vocal opponent, both in my personal life
and in online forums, of the barbaric practice known in all its forms in US
statutory language as Female Genital Mutilation.
I live in a community with one of the highest immigrant Somali populations in the United States, and have heard from people in my community (both Somali immigrants and native locals) that the immigrant community here in Minnesota continues the practice of FGM, even though it is illegal in this country and in this state.
Hesperado: How bad is this problem in this immigrant community?
CGW: Upwards of 98% of Somali females are
"circumcised"; typically this takes the form of one of the more
severe forms of the practice, including complete clitorectomy/clitoridectomy,
excision or removal of the labia (both majora and minora), and infibulation, or
"sewing up" of the external tissue that remains, leaving only a
pencil-sized opening for the flow of menstrual blood and urine. For
graphic evidence of these practices, see this link.
Hesperado: Let me understand you on this: you've just listed
various stages of the process, from less severe to worse, where
"infibulation" is the worst form?
CGW: That's right -- but remember, they are all just forms of the
same practice, which has been deemed under our American laws to be a felony
crime, no matter by what degree of severity it's practiced.
Hesperado: And so these Somalis are getting away with this right in our
backyard, under our noses?
CGW: Children are taken back to Somalia for the procedure, or are
having it performed locally, both of which are illegal. There are individuals
in various positions in municipal government agencies who have told tales of
botched procedures done on kitchen tables at home using a razor blade where the
children were in danger of bleeding to death, and which resulted in 911 being
called; the cases have never been prosecuted due to a pervasive climate of
deferring to "cultural sensitivity" here in Minnesota. None of these
individuals would go on the record or pursue prosecution of these cases as they
were warned that they would lose jobs, pensions, and would face physical
retribution by the Somali community if they spoke out on the issue.
Hesperado: And you know of this through personal knowledge, but the
specifics you do not, or cannot divulge, in order to protect certain
individuals?
CGW: Yes. For example, I could provide a witness who could
"name names" but that person made a pledge of confidentiality to the
individuals involved and declines to go on the record.
Hesperado: Fascinating, and it's disconcerting that even with your
relative knowledge of the local scene in terms of this problem, you had not
heard of Dr. Elhagaly, who was right there in your general region. That
makes one wonder how many other Dr. Elhagaly's there are out there whom we
don't know about -- not only in Minnesota, but in other areas of concentration
of Muslim immigrants in America, not to mention anywhere in the West.
CGW: True. I guess we have to take these problems one step
at a time.
Hesperado: Just out of curiosity, do you know if Dr. Elhagaly is
himself Somali or is he just being an "ecumenical" Muslim helping his
Muslim brothers from another culture?
CGW: I believe that Dr. Elhagaly is from Egypt. This is what I
found in the course of my research. Your readers can go here
for more information.
And this is a cached copy of a page formerly at the Mayo Health System
website.
Hesperado: Thanks, that's interesting. As we know, Egypt also has
an incredibly high incidence of FGM itself -- over 90%.
Birds of a feather, as they say... Now let's get back to you. At
the point when you learned about Dr. Elhagaly, what did you begin to do about
the situation? Did you have any previous experience with any kind of
social activism before?
CGW: Aside from the occasional participation in online
activities, (such as Pamela Geller's effort to encourage Butterball to label their whole turkeys "halal" when they
are indeed certifying them as such, both for export to the Middle East and for
the broader American market, around Thanksgiving 2011), and participation in
the comments sections of online forums, I had no experience with any kind of activism
whatsoever.
Hesperado: What were your first steps then? Were you (pardon the
expression) flying by the seat of your pants?
CGW: My first step was to try and find out what I could about the
pediatrician in question. I contacted the Mayo Clinic in a series of phone
calls, trying to determine who to call to make an official complaint about what
I perceived to be advocacy of an illegal procedure. The first hurdle I
encountered was determining that the pseudonym of the physician was not his
legal name for the purposes of employment. I asked about a "Dr. Hatem
Al-haj", the name in the original article at Translating Jihad, and was
told that no such physician worked there. Several of my online comrades also
had this problem as they tried to contact Mayo directly. So I searched the Mayo
Clinic Health System site for Albert Lea, MN and found his photo identifying
him as Dr. Hatem Elhagaly. With that name in hand, I resumed calling Mayo. I
was pretty much given the run-around; it was clear that the individuals I spoke
to were not all that willing to address the situation. I left several messages
for different individuals but never received a call back. Finally I was given
the email address of an individual in the Public Affairs Department to whom to
address emails. After a few exchanges, he provided me with another contact
email address for the general public to use to address the issue with the Mayo
Health System.
From there, I consulted
an acquaintance with an interest in health-and-wellness issues who volunteered
to organize a petition on the website Change.org. This petition being
established, I began the process of attempting to disseminate the information
that I had gathered to various organizations, websites, etc.
Hesperado: It's interesting to contemplate that you had little
experience of political activism under your belt, but you plunged in anyway,
making all those phone calls until you finally tracked down at least someone at
Mayo Clinic you could begin to contact to communicate your concerns. At that
point, after you had the public relations contact and your friend began the
online petition, what was the next step? Did you just sit back and wait
for the petition to grow numbers, or did you have to do more phone-calling
work?
CGW: After I had left a few phone messages for several parties at
the Mayo Clinic Health System -- both at the Rochester and Albert Lea
facilities -- that went unanswered, I pretty much despaired of hearing back
from anyone by phone and shifted my efforts to Internet communication. All of
this was still happening on the very first day, May 3. Both the phone calling
and initial email contact began before the petition was ever organized; that
came later in the evening.
Hesperado: And so the Mayo Clinic wasn't timely about responding?
CGW: Actually, Mayo never got back to me independently on the
resolution of the matter; I never received anything from them regarding my
initial inquiry except an email saying that they were investigating the matter
and thanking me for my "outreach". I followed up on May 16, and
received a short response stating that Dr. Elhagaly was no longer employed or
caring for patients at the Mayo Clinic facility in Albert Lea. I responded,
asking if he continued to be employed by Mayo in any capacity.
The reply was in the negative.
Hesperado: How did you find that out?
CGW: This came from the Public Affairs Department.
Hesperado: And so how did the process play out from there?
CGW: The rest of the process was pretty straightforward. I posted
a few comments online during the day about my progress in getting in touch with
people, as well as additional information on the issue. Once the petition was
complete and ready to sign, I began a series of outgoing emails alerting people
to the issue.
Hesperado: Now I know the petition had specific people and/or entities
slated to be contacted with the petition results. Did you contact anyone
else?
CGW: Yes. Along with the designated recipients named in the
petition, who each received an email for every signature added, I contacted
local, regional and national media (both television and print - no response),
the MN BCA (Bureau of Criminal Apprehension), the MN Attorney General (asking
the last two to investigate whether or not anything criminal was taking place or
had occurred), a few hundred Mayo Clinic Health System physicians and
practitioners, a few websites, some online acquaintances, friends and family
members. I also posted the same information in the comments sections of several
websites, especially those which had already carried the initial article from Translating
Jihad. I spent the better part of a 24-hour period composing and sending
out emails, with little sleep. I felt driven.
Hesperado: Your perseverance is much appreciated by all of us concerned
about this issue. When I first saw your notices in comments threads on
Jihad Watch about the petition, I just imagined some guy who had a link trying
to alert other readers to sign a petition. I had no idea of all the work
you were putting into this project.
CGW: I did receive a helpful reply from the MN BCA, advising me
that they only follow up on referrals from law enforcement agencies and from
county attorneys' offices. They suggested that I contact the
MN Attorney General’s Office, the Minnesota Board of Medical Practice and
the Dept. of Human Services Protective Services Unit. The second was
already being contacted through the petition, and I had already contacted the
first directly. At that point I decided not to pursue contacting the DHS-PSU,
keeping the option open for a later date if necessary.
Hesperado: After the initial point starting the whole process, and
before the Mayo Clinic announced that Dr. Elhagaly was no longer working for
them, did you hear from them?
CGW: No Mayo Clinic physicians/practitioners replied to me
directly, but I did receive notification that one of the pediatricians that
worked with Dr. Elhagaly in Albert Lea had forwarded the email to the Public
Affairs Department at Mayo. I also received a supportive response from the
administrator of one of the websites that I frequent. Online acquaintances
posted additional helpful information and encouraging comments. One friend
reported that he had posted links on 10 separate FaceBook pages that he visits
regularly, as well as at additional websites.
Hesperado: When you said that you --
"...contacted local, regional
and national media (both television and print - no response), the MN BCA
(Bureau of Criminal Apprehension), the MN Attorney General (asking the last two
to investigate whether or not anything criminal was taking place or had
occurred), a few hundred Mayo Clinic Health System physicians and
practitioners..."
-- am I correct in assuming by
"contact" you mean you emailed and phone-called? Did you have a
system? Did you first try to phone-call, then if that didn't get through,
you emailed? Or did you just do one and the other in no apparent
order? Or did you just do one form (email or phone) and not the other for
all these?
CGW: I only emailed them. As I mentioned previously, after an
initial day spent waiting in vain for Mayo representatives to return my calls,
I decided that email contact would be more fruitful, as it would provide all
the information I needed to convey in a written format that could be referred
to at any time, saved and passed on to others. I knew that I could effectively
reach more people in a shorter amount of time by sending out an informational
email. Calling and waiting on the line an inordinate amount of time to get
passed around from person to person only to ultimately be forwarded to a
voicemail system seemed unproductive and proved frustrating as well.
Hesperado: How did you get the email contact info for all those medical
people you contacted? In my (limited) experience, I've found that often
doctors and other medical practitioners don't like their email addresses out in
public for non-patients to see.
CGW: I've had the same experience trying to get my own doctor's
email address, to no avail, ultimately.
I accomplished the mass-emailing in
a rather interesting way. Once I've let the secret out of the bag, I hope they
don't change the system to shield their employees from further contact from the
public!
When I had trouble getting in
contact by telephone with anyone in Public Affairs at the Mayo Clinic who could
be responsive to me, I called both the PA office and the facility in Albert Lea
and requested an email address for the public to contact, warning that absence
of the same would risk tying up their phone system for days with calls of
complaint and protest. Upon being given three such addresses, I noticed a
pattern of how the addresses were structured, using the first and last names of
the intended recipients. I then began researching a list of Mayo Clinic
physicians/practitioners by accessing their online database which lists all of
them by name and specialty. This information in hand, I stayed up all night
typing in each deduced address one by one.
Hesperado: Amazing, all the ingenuity and patient attention to detail
you put into this.
CGW: I literally hand-typed each address, referencing the names
on each printed page one by one, spelling the names out loud to myself both as
I read them and as I typed them. I contacted hundreds of doctors in the
Mayo System, primarily in the departments of Pediatrics (Community Pediatric
and Adolescent Medicine, Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, Pediatric
Emergency Medicine, Pediatric General Medicine, General Pediatric and
Adolescent Medicine-Pediatric Diagnostic and Referral Clinic, Pediatric
Gynecology, Pediatric Nephrology, Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Pediatric
Pain Management, Pediatric Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Pediatric
Plastic Surgery, Pediatric Psychiatry and Psychology, Pediatric Research,
Pediatric Urology), Obstetrics and Gynecology (Gynecologic Surgery, Gynecology,
Nurse Midwives, Obstetrics, Reproductive Medicine, Urogynecology), Family
Medicine in Minnesota, Urology in Minnesota, Women's Health Clinic in
Minnesota, along with a few other individual names. Primarily, I chose
departments whose physicians/practitioners I felt would have either a direct or
tangential interest in the subject of FGM.
Hesperado: When you spell it out like that, it's really staggering, and
all of us concerned about this issue remain indebted to you. Even so, it
sounds like you didn't get much response from any of these people. Did
you follow-up with everyone who did not respond to you anyway, during the time
before the day you were informed that Dr.Elhagaly was no longer employed (May
16)?
CGW: The only responses I received are outlined above; and I did
not follow up with any of the other parties that I contacted initially, with
the exception of the request for information that I made to the Mayo Clinic on
May 16. I figured that, if people were interested or concerned, they would
reply to my initial email or forward it onward to the indicated parties.
Hesperado: Sorry for seeming a little dense here, but I'm still unclear
as to whether you emailed people independently of sending them the
petition, in addition to emailing them the petition. Or was there only
one emailing of all those people, and it included the petition? When you
mentioned about how you contacted all those medical personnel including doctors
etc. Did that precede the emailing of the petition, or was it the same
process?
CGW: There was only one email directly from me to the entire list
of recipients. It included a link to the translation of the original Arabic
article at the Translating Jihad website; a link to the doctor's
employment information page at the Mayo Clinic Health System (Albert Lea
website); a link to his own website, where he uses the pseudonym "Sheik
Hatem Al-Haj"; a link to some information about the practice of FGM; and
lastly, a link to the first draft of the petition.
Hesperado: How long did it take for the first petition to be
complete? Was it simply ongoing until the "victory day" (May
16)?
CGW: The number of signed names on the petition grew slowly but
steadily.
Hesperado: How long did it take for the petition to garner a sufficient
number of names? Like, how long did it take for 100 names to
appear?
CGW: I think that it took a couple of days to reach 100
signatures or so.
Hesperado: To whom exactly was the petition communicated ?
CGW: The petition letter was communicated to the Mayo Clinic
Public Affairs Department, the American Board of Pediatrics (Board of
Directors), the American Academy of Pediatrics (Board of Directors), the
Minnesota Board of Medical Practice (Board of Directors), the American Medical
Association, and the American Board of Pediatrics (Maintenance of
Certification). The petition organizer did all the legwork, i.e., the research
necessary to determine which organizations should receive the petition letter
and their contact information.
Hesperado: Did they receive the complete list of the petition signers
as it was growing?
CGW: No, actually, each time someone signed the petition, an
email went out to each of the above-named recipients with that person's
signature, generating a veritable flood of individual emails to their inboxes.
Also, a link to the petition was
sent to all the recipients that I enumerated before in various medical
departments and offices. I have no idea if any of the individuals with whom I
communicated directly signed the petition, but the petition organizer is privy
to that information. We'd need to compare lists to see.
I also posted a link to the petition
online at several websites.
Hesperado: And, of course, the petition has "morphed" into a
second petition.
CGW: That's right. It has been modified to reflect Dr.
Elhagaly's departure from the Mayo Clinic (the Mayo Clinic has been removed
from the list of contactees). And the petition is still ongoing as
we speak. It can be seen at this link.
Hesperado: As significant as the May 16 victory was, it's not enough
that Dr. Elhagaly is no longer working at a particular clinic. What is
the purpose of this second petition?
CGW: Two main purposes: 1) to urge proper authorities to
revoke Dr. Elhagaly's medical certifications; and 2) to refute the statements
made by followers of his that the entire petition effort has been the result of
"Islamophobia" -- a word, by the way, invented by the Muslim
Brotherhood in America to suppress all legitimate criticism of Islam, sharia
law and Islamic practices -- which in this case serves the purpose of trying to
deflect the public's attention away from genuine problems, such as a concern
for the medical and health implications of the situation.
Hesperado: And to whom all is this petition going to be sent?
CGW: The American Board of Pediatrics, the American Academy of
Pediatrics, the Minnesota Board of Medical Practice, the American Medical
Association, and the American Board of Pediatrics.
Hesperado: It boggles the mind that this advocate of female
circumcision/mutilation is a pediatrician practicing in the U.S.A.!
CGW: Indeed.
Hesperado: How is this second petition going so far?
CGW: Very well. The total signatories at any given time can
be checked by visiting the link I gave you.
Hesperado: And that link, to remind the readers, is this one. Well, CGW, I thank you for taking
the time out to answer my questions. I think it has been quite
enlightening to any of my readers interested in the nuts and bolts of how an
ordinary person can get involved and make a difference. I wish you and
the petitioners the best of luck with their goal.
CGW: Thank you very much.
CGW: Thank you very much.
2 comments:
Hesperado, an outstanding interview. CGW, you have done and are doing a great thing. You must be rather pleased. And you should be. Thank you!!! I'm going to sign the petition, right now.
Thanks Traeh, much appreciated. Let's hope CGW's second petition is as successful as the first!
Post a Comment