"Well,
maybe Mr. Simon won't have to worry long about armed Americans (nor
those armed politicians who want to arm Americans), as now the Americans
who want to disarm Americans are bristling with arms themselves.
"One would have to read Diana West and a precious few other real journalists out there to know what I'm talking about.
"Here's a lengthy excerpt from her recent report:
During
the last 10 months, the Department of Homeland Security has purchased
1.6 billion rounds of ammunition, including millions of hollow-point
bullets. The department also has purchased 7,000 fully automatic assault
rifles, and it has overseen the retrofitting of more than 2,000 light
tanks, which, of course, were originally designed to resist the mines
and ambushes of the battlefield. Why does DHS need such offensive and
defensive firepower?
Remember, DHS stands for Department
of Homeland Security, and “homeland,” just to be extremely clear, means
the USA. Obama must be asked against which domestic enemy he is arming
nonmilitary forces. It sounds incredible, to be sure, but are we
watching administration battle plans take shape against American
citizens on the streets of Your Town, USA?
...
Government
spokesmen, when they’re not trying to make 1.6 billion bullets sound
like a frugal, Costco-style bulk purchase, will tell you it’s all about
target practice. Really? I hear that U.S. Army newbies soon to deploy to
Afghanistan are training with blank cartridges. Why the priority for
arming domestic forces, not military ones?
Even the
liberal-minded “debunking” site Snopes.com confirms that the Social
Security Administration has procured 174,000 hollow-point bullets for
300 special agents. Meanwhile, the National Marine Fisheries Service,
which is tasked with “protecting fish stocks from depletion,” has
procured 46,000 hollow-point bullets. Spokesman Scott Smullen explained,
straight-faced, I am guessing, that 63 fisheries service “enforcement
agents” will be using the so-called cop-killer bullets for “target
qualifications.”
And that’s nothing. Last month, Paul
Joseph Watson of Infowars.com reported that DHS purchased 21.6 million
more rounds of ammunition, including 10 million hollow-point bullets.
The latter, of course, are prohibited by the rules of war.
Commentators who have done the math tell us the feds’ ammo dump includes enough bullets to fight the war in Iraq for 27 years, or enough bullets to shoot every American citizen five times over.
...the mainstream media, can restore balance with attention and exposure.
[They] might start with Watson’s coverage last month for Infowars.com of Law Enforcement Targets Inc. (LET), a
Minnesota-based manufacturer that has received $2 million in
unspecified contracts from DHS in the last three years. Recently, Watson
writes, the company began selling cardboard cutout targets designed to
“desensitize police” to “nontraditional threat targets,” as the online
catalog called them. These targets included very pregnant women,
children and other civilians in home, playground or other neighborhood
settings. All hold guns.
...
In its apology,
LET insisted these heinous civilian targets weren’t the company’s idea.
“This product line was originally requested and designed by the law
enforcement community. …”
I asked a friend with a long
career in state and local law enforcement if he’d ever seen the like. He
replied: “No. Hell, no. The targets I was trained to fire upon depicted
people who really looked like armed criminals. No pregnant women. No
kids. No old people. … I could have shot three armed men during my
career and been justified. Right or wrong, I didn’t shoot them. These
no-hesitation targets are disgusting.”
What branch of law
enforcement requested and designed them? DHS? Fisheries? Social
Security? Who exactly is planning for the kind of action that requires
all those bullets? Is the government, as some suggest, depleting
ammunition stocks as a means of gun control? Then why light tanks, too?
We don’t know the answers to any of these questions.
It's safe to assume that he semi-retired with a great deal of money and is living in midtown Manhattan in a building with a doorman and perhaps a security guard. Under his own circumstances, not keeping a gun for defense may be a reasonable choice. What is not reasonable is generalizing his own situation to everyone else and demanding that they follow his choice.
Mr. Simon was once a fairly non-politically-correct critic who often got into hot water for noticing things about blacks that he wasn't supposed to notice, or admit to noticing. Now, though, he seems blissfully unaware of the tidal wave of violent black-on-white crime. Maybe his ignorance stems from getting his news from the New York Times and his old host, New York magazine.
This posting symbolizes part of our national pathology: comfortable liberals, safe in their high-rises or gated communities, living in mostly-white environments, scold the less fortunate who are not insulated against predators and want to protect themselves and their families.