Rearranging deck chairs on the H.M.S. Titanic...
"Not all Muslims are savages."As the song says, "Show me!"Egghead
I agree that Muslims are responsible to clear up that ambiguity as to which of them is jihadist and sharia-ist, and which of them is against jihad and sharia -- and they are not clearing things up. Obviously there are too few Muslims who believe in real religious freedom.And they probably will never be held accountable, except in very crude and extreme ways, when real disaster strikes (like 50,000 dead in a terror attack). I doubt whether the nation has the mental equipment to handle Islam in the civilized ways Robert Spencer has in mind. Too much subtlety required. Instead, you'll probably have extreme PC types opposing their own crude extremisms to the crude brutality of others who want to cut the Gordian knot and just apply some very simple, brutal solution. In the face of 50,000 or more deaths by Islamic terror, a compromise form of "mildly brutal" policy will perhaps be adopted. Actually, 50,000 might be too small a number to overcome the ideas of PC forces in public opinion. But the number is probably not that much higher -- 100,000? But even then, the society might not deport Muslims as a group. What society surely will do is increase surveillance massively on all of us, especially Muslims. The increase in surveillance would be so massive that life might well become unrecognizable. So massive that liberal democracy would be profoundly transformed, to the extent that it might cease to exist.
"...PC types opposing their own crude extremisms to the crude brutality of others..." should read"...PC types opposing their own crude ideas to the crude brutality of others..."
"So massive that liberal democracy would be profoundly transformed, to the extent that it might cease to exist."Such transformation is, of course, the ENTIRE purpose of oft-imported Muslims who will be disposable to the New World Order once Muslims have fulfilled their function to cause the Western masses to beg for and fulfill their own Western enslavement.This is WHY I disagree with our good host Hesperado that PC MC springs from good intentions that - whoopsie! - achieve bad results.Indeed, the bad results are the planned end results of some quite evil people who have propagandized and forced upon us such PC MC for their own purposes.
Hesperado,You are the only guy I know of who is actually clear as to what needs to be done to clear the West of the menace that is Muslims. However your solutions are not going to get implemented any time soon. The other approach is to actually use Islam against Muslims. Admittedly, even this might not get anywhere until things get much worse, and the west is actually willing to consider this. The only place I can see this getting implemented currently is in China.The solution is actually very simple. Implement Sharia Law in toto for Muslims only. If the West implements Shariah Law in toto, you'll either see Muslims abandoning Islam or voluntarily migrating back to their hell hole countries from which they came. When Muslims ask for Sharia Law in the West, what they are asking for is the Civil Part of Shariah Law, particularly the Marriage Laws. Muslims ( outside of the Dar-al- Islam ) rarely want Full Shariah. Even when an Anjum Chowdary asks for Sharia, it is in the full belief that he will be part of the elite gang administering Sharia, rather than being the one at the receiving end. Just imagine, if a convict who converts to Islam in prison will receive the Islamic punishment for his crime, he will never convert.Even holding a demonstration would become a capital crime under Shariah.Any prospective terrorist would receive the death penalty.Most people who receive harsh punishments would convert out of Islam, as they would then be no longer subject to Shariah punishment. The possibilities are endless, but the net result would be that Islam would be decimated in any country which implements this. Of course in Muslim - Non Muslim interactions, the Shariah provisions should be reversed.
Post a Comment