When the whole Brexit thing happened, I noted how Debbie Schlussel with searing cogency pointed out that a Brexit without an "Islamexit" will likely be (at best) too little, too late.
Now, on the day of the Macy's Thanksgiving Parade (which Jihad Watch reports appositely has markedly ramped up security, thanks to the danger of Muslims exploding), Debbie has posted a sobering exposé of Trump's choice for Secretary of Education, Betsy DeVos, as a career Arabophile and Islamophile. Commenters on her blog speculate that this speaks to Trump being a bit gullble and malleable -- and, more importantly, not doing his homework on the people he's choosing.
5 comments:
I do hope Betsy Devos gets bumped. I wish he had picked Ben Carson for either this, or Surgeon General.
Also, I hope they pick a Secretary of State who views Muslims as the bigger enemy, not the Russians. Either Giuliani or Tulsi Gabbard would be good here, maybe John Bolton as well. But not Romney
In 2012, Giuliani said:
"I have great respect for the Islamic religion. I have great respect for the Arab world, for the Middle East... and on the evening of September 11, 2001, the day my city was attacked, I got on television, and I said to the people of my city, “We’re not going to engage in group blame. This is a small group of people. This does not typify a great religion and a great people.”
I.e., there is a deeper stealth jihad, and a deeper Useful Idiocy, which will eventually subvert and destroy the West unless we turn around this nonsense. A Trump victory has signalled to Muslims that they must burrow in more deeply with Better Cops; and the Western complement to the Better Cops are not the Dumb of the standard-issue Useful Idiot, but the "Dumberer" of the stalwart anti-terrorism analyst such as Frank Gaffney, picked by Trump to be a security adviser, who still can't see that the mainstream Islam of his friend Zuhdi Jasser is the same Islam of ISIS and that therefore either Jasser is insane or he is lying to Frank. While a Trump victory is good, the question is if, over the long haul, it will be good enough to save the West from destruction. It remains questionable.
Edit: ...absolute prescription...
So, let's just pretend for a moment that it's only three very smart people in the discussion: a white Western Christian, a racially Jewish agnostic, and an Indian/Asian immigrant.
Let's also understand that the middle aged white Western Christian was genuinely 100% PC MC - in every sense - until the last few years - and is still a genuinely moral and good hearted person.
Here is my message to the racially Jewish agnostic and Indian/Asian immigrant:
You socially taught and legally forced white Western Christians to avoid discrimination at all costs, and now you criticize white Western Christians for lacking the ability to discriminate.
Now, you want to re-teach white Western Christians to discriminate, BUT 1) only in ways that directly benefit Jews and Indians/Asians, and 2) without offering white Western Christians any tangible benefits or consideration in return.
So, powerful Jews still want to rule white Western Christians with an iron fist (until genociding us completely).
And, smart opportunistic Indian/Asians still want to ditch their own failed societies (except where spying for them) and take the plum jobs and also assets in white Western countries.
You can try to ignore the point of view of smart white Western Christians, but it would be far better for everyone if you acknowledged, understood and addressed our concerns - instead of continuing to steal from us at your own peril. White Western Christians have been awakened to the lack of reciprocity of smart Jews and Indian/Asians in sharing power, jobs and assets.
I read two related recent comments on two different web sites.
The first comment was from an Australian man who said that Chinese people are 'buying' the university slots for all of the most highly paid professions in Australia, and that he can barely find a white doctor who is not a 'kike' (his word - I had to look it up), and that Australians are second class citizens. Is it just that all Australian doctors henceforth be only - or even mainly - Jewish or Chinese?
The second comment was from a retired high level computer science professional who said that his friends in the medical profession are very smug about their high salaries and 'skills' (his use of quotation marks). He says that he tells them that, one of these days, their masters may import 100k Indian doctors, nurses, etc., to lower medical wages, and that his friends say that the government 'would never do that' to which he replies that, the government did it to his field. My thought is that, as long as Jewish people need upper middle class jobs, we will see those jobs maintain their high status and salary. Last that I heard 20 years ago in Russia, doctors were low paid women.
Meanwhile, if you read Karl Denninger, then you know that he has tagged artificially inflated and unsustainable medical expenses as THE cause of an imminent financial catastrophe that will, in the near term, either cause the dissolution of the United States - or the next World War - or both.
Put all these data points together, and we see a medical monopoly designed to keep costs artificially high by forcing the white middle class to buy an inferior product that will bankrupt the white middle class via premiums or illness - while more and more excluding white people from filling the high paying medical jobs filled by Jews - and imported Asians and Indians. Is it just that all USA doctors henceforth be only - or even mainly - Jewish or Asian/Indian?
Post a Comment