Friday, September 12, 2014

"Not all Muslims are bad"

http://comps.gograph.com/muslim-family-at-mosque_gg61895845.jpg

While it’s true that the anxiously impulsive spasm to leap to “but all Muslims aren’t bad” whenever anyone dares to call Islam itself into question is a red herring fallacy (and, alas, all too prevalent throughout the West), it’s not enough for us to react by reminding such an interlocutor that we are not talking about “all Muslims” but rather only about Islam itself.

The reason it’s not enough is that there is in fact a problem of Muslims following their Islam. And this problem is not a nice and tidy problem of a Tiny Minority of Extremists who will forever remain a small number. The problem of Muslims following their Islam has two features which have to be faced by the mainstream (and by the asymptotics within the Counter-Jihad).

The problem is:

1) systemic

and

2) metastasizing.

By systemic, it means that the problem is not just a “tiny minority” but is much broader. To say it is a broader problem triggers anxiety among PC MCs and asymptotics, causing them to worry that opening up the barrier of the Tiny Minority to consider a broader demographic problem among Muslims around the world is to lead us inexorably to the logical conclusion of “all Muslims”—and from there, of course, to rounding them up, putting them in camps, and genociding them (a natural inevitability, of course, seeing that we Westerners are naturally prone to such a "racist" “backlash”).  And so, the impulse is to shut down this line of thought altogether, to nip the thought crime in the bud, so to speak.

And when I use the locution “the problem of Muslims following their Islam”, the reasonably informed rhetorical questions this should immediately generate in us are the following: “How many Muslims are not following their Islam? And how would we really know that any given Muslims are genuinely not following their Islam rather than trying to deceive us by pretending to be not following their Islam?”

By metastasizing, I mean that the problem (of Muslims following their Islam) is not static; it's getting worse. Indeed, it has been getting worse over the course of the entire 20th century; though, of course, most Westerners have been comfortably oblivious to it until it bit them in the ass on 9/11—and even after that (and hundreds of other atrocities in the years since then) most Westerners remain clueless.
So no, we should not evade the PC MC accusation about us supposedly saying (or implying) that “all Muslims are bad” by refusing to talk about the problem of Muslims. That would be to play the PC MC game by PC MC rules.

Further Reading:

Statistics: a double-edged sword in the War of Ideas

1 comment:

Hitaman1 said...

Off topic

Advocating the use of in-vitro fertilization (IVF) with gene selection for intelligence and Nordic features (blue/green/hazel iris, blonde/red hair, very fair skin and tall stature) among other desirable White traits—‘designer babies’; as the sole method of fertilization by racially aware WN women is of paramount importance to purifying the genes of racially aware WN White as, in case you don’t know, tens of millions of Whites are descendants of Europeans who have been subjected to sex slavery to the non-White Muslim Arab and Turkish invaders for hundreds of years (before the advent of reliable contraception) and they are, as a matter of fact, still contaminated by non-White genes.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Umayyad_Caliphate
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ottoman_Empire
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Designer_baby
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preimplantation_genetic_diagnosis

As I am sure you know, blonde and red hair; blue and green eyes; and very pale skin are exclusively White traits—not found in any other ethnic group internationally accepted as Caucasian. Does a Portuguese like Christiano Ronaldo or an Armenian like Kim K. qualify as White? No, of course not—neither do the olive-skinned, brown-eyed and brown-haired Italians, Greeks and especially the Spaniards just to name a few nationalities who are internationally identified as Whites. Do you understand the point I’m trying to convey? Only red/blonde-haired, green/blue-eyed, very fair-skinned people should be considered White.
http://westernparadigm.wordpress.com/2008/02/26/the-blue-eye-map-of-europe/
http://mapscroll.blogspot.com/2009/02/blonde-hair-map.html

Just imagine how charmingly captivating and wonderful it would be if the above posted maps were entirely colored in pale blue and pale yellow respectively and that could be realized only if the WN key leaders and prominent figures, like yourself, fervently and persistently advocate and recommend the use of IVF with gene selection for Nordic features as the sole method of fertilization by racially aware WN women, especially brown-eyed, brown-haired ones—hopefully, the majority of racially aware Whites would heed the recommendation and the rest of not yet racially aware Whites would follow suit when they finally open their eyes.

Kind regards,
Ismail Mohamed (an Egyptian ex-Muslims Atheist whose Counter-Jihad mantra is: "Fuck the pedobear Mo' and his imaginary Allah."